DDIVO
    JJEPI
    SSPYI
    JJEPQ
    IIAUI
    QQYLD
    covered-callsIncome Investing

    Double-Digit Income? My Ultimate Covered Call ETF Guide

    Double-Digit Income? My Ultimate Covered Call ETF Guide
    • NEOS IAUI: ~13% headline distribution vs <2% 30-day SEC yield, gap from option premiums and return of capital, you receive sold upside not dividend income
    • Covered calls harvest the volatility risk premium - higher implied volatility yields larger premiums, so JEPQ > JEPI in premium size; IAUI can post double-digit distributions
    • High realized volatility and whipsaws hurt covered-call returns - e.g., $100 to $85 to $100 with new calls at $88 leaves you behind despite premiums, loss hides in capped recoveries
    • Strike and coverage drive outcomes - QYLD writes ATM on 100% for very high yield and almost no upside; DIVO writes OTM on a fraction of the book, yields ~5%, 1-yr TR ~15%, CAGR ~12% since 2016, beta ~0.66
    • Due diligence: compare distribution rate, 30-day SEC yield, and total return; read 19a-1 notices and watch NAV to distinguish destructive vs tax-classified RoC.
    Leo Nelissen
    Jul 9, 20261:03 PM3320

    Every time I write about gold, my inbox fills with the same question. What do I think about IAUI?

    IAUI is the NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). It pays a distribution rate of roughly 13%. On gold, which is an asset that has never paid a dividend in its life, as everyone reading this knows. It's a commodity.

    That number does something to people. So let me show you the other number.

    IAUI's 30-day SEC yield, which is the income the fund actually earns from what it holds, is under 2%. The gap between 13% and 2% is not magic, but the option premium and return of capital. Essentially, the fund sells gold's upside for cash, then hands you the cash.

    Main Street Alpha

    That is the entire covered call trade in one sentence. You are not buying income. You are selling volatility, and you get paid today for capping your gains tomorrow.

    It's also why I have been skeptical of these funds for one simple reason. If I am bullish on something, I do not want to cap my upside. That view has not changed. But it is only half the story.

    Sometimes you are not bullish. Sometimes you are neutral, retired, or holding an asset that pays you nothing at all. In those cases, selling upside you never expected to use is not a sacrifice. It is a smart trade.

    Hence, this is not a piece about whether covered call ETFs are good or bad. It is about matching the right fund to the right job.

    That's why I spent the past few days working my way through everything you need to know about covered call strategies and ETFs, and I believe I have created a very helpful piece that I would turn into a chapter if I ever were to write a book on investing.

    Having said all of this, as we have a lot on our plate, let's get right to it!

    Keep Reading

    Create a free account to access more content.

    Sign in to leave a comment and join the discussion.

    Sign Up Free