OOWL
    OOBDC
    AAPO
    AARES
    Alternative Asset ManagementPrivate CreditIncome Investing

    Blue Owl Capital (OWL): The Gate Held, the Stock Did Not

    Blue Owl Capital (OWL): The Gate Held, the Stock Did Not
    • Market priced the tender requests, not actual liquidity - OWL shares fell from $15.77 (Nov 2025) to $11.68, hitting the high-$7s in April despite broad market +14% over the same period
    • Flagship repurchase requests hit 18.8% (~$3.6bn); manager honored 5% cap, net outflows $660m; tech fund outflows $100m - combined net $760m versus $7.8bn raised platform-wide, outflows = 0.25% of $319bn AUM
    • Fee-paying assets $190.6bn (+7% YoY), permanent capital $225.0bn; fee-related earnings $392.2m ($0.25 adj share) and distributable earnings $351.2m ($0.22) - both +9% as real assets near 30% of AUM
    • Valuation by cash earnings ~13.3x current distributable run-rate, ~13.1x 2026 consensus, ~11.5x fee-related; trailing dividend yield ~7.7% and run-rate yield ~7.9% on $0.23
    • Operational and capital risks are real - TTM fundraising down to $50.5bn (-11%), net debt/EBITDA ~4.07x, interest coverage 2.92x, priced $750m 10yr at 6.75%
    Glenn Ford
    Aug 25, 20262:26 PM90

    GNG Research customers have asked me a few times to do a follow-up article with my thoughts on Blue Owl Capital (OWL), especially after the stock's sharp decline and the wave of headlines around private-credit redemptions. Read the original article Blue Owl Capital (OWL): Fear Is Loud, Cash Is Quiet, published November 7, 2025.

    Every non-traded credit fund has a gate. It is a contractual limit, usually five percent per quarter, that decides how much money can leave before the manager has to start selling loans to fund the exit.

    Think of it as the release valve on a reservoir. When investors line up to withdraw, the request number is only a pressure reading. What actually drains is a separate number entirely. They have almost nothing to do with each other.

    For the last ten months, the market has been trading the pressure reading.

    I wrote the original piece on Blue Owl in early November 2025 at a reference price of $15.77. The argument was that the operating business kept compounding while sentiment collapsed. Operationally, that held up.

    The stock did not, and I want to be direct about that before anything else. Against a market that gained about 14 percent over the same stretch, the article page shows roughly a 20 percent loss. Shares changed hands near $11.68 as I write this and touched the high sevens in April.

    So, this is a second look at a position that went against me, with the benefit of three more quarters of disclosure.

    What Actually Went Through the Gate

    Here is the number that flipped this for me.

    Keep Reading

    Create a free account to access more content.

    Sign in to leave a comment and join the discussion.

    Sign Up Free