PPDD
    BBABA
    JJD
    China StocksUltra Value Buy

    PDD After Q2: The Market Is Pricing In a Collapse the Numbers Don't Show

    PDD After Q2: The Market Is Pricing In a Collapse the Numbers Don't Show
    • Earnings decline driven by discretionary opex, not gross margin - R&D +40%, G&A >2x, S&M +10% and 26% of revenue, operating margin recovered to 24.7%
    • Q2 revenue RMB112.4bn, up 8% but below RMB114-115bn est; net income -12% to RMB27.2bn, non-GAAP EPS RMB19.33 per ADS vs est RMB18.35
    • Demand signals weakening - transaction services +13% to RMB54.7bn, online marketing +3.4% to RMB57.6bn; transaction growth slowed from 20% in Q1 to 13%
    • EU low-value cross-border duties took effect July, outside Q2; management flagged considerable impact and plans local merchants, warehousing and consolidation - Q3 is the first clean test
    • Cash RMB456.4bn (~$67bn), ~50% of market cap, negligible leverage, 10 consecutive FCF periods, zero shareholder yield; BFV ~$137 vs price $85.69, consider accumulate
    Glenn Ford
    Sep 1, 20261:52 PM100

    Priced as of the August 28, 2026 close.

    PDD Holdings (PDD) reported second-quarter results before the open on Monday the 24th. Revenue came in light, net income fell 12%, and by Friday's close the stock had given up about 3% on the week.

    That is a stock down roughly 30% over twelve months reacting to a profit decline with a shrug. Nobody panicked and nobody stepped in.

    So let me set the stage for you. This is my first full write-up on the (PDD), and it exists because the headline numbers and the ones underneath them point in different directions. Where margin damage sits matters more than how big it is, and most of the coverage has put it in the wrong place.

    What actually got reported

    Revenue came in at RMB112.4 billion, up 8% year over year, below the roughly RMB114 billion to RMB115 billion analysts had forecast. Net income attributable to ordinary shareholders fell 12% to RMB27.2 billion. Non-GAAP earnings of RMB19.33 per ADS came in ahead of the RMB18.35 analysts had estimated.

    Operating profit went the other way and rose 8% to RMB27.8 billion, a GAAP operating margin near 24.7%. Operating cash flow came in at RMB25.7 billion against RMB21.6 billion a year earlier.

    Read the first two lines alone and the bear case looks confirmed. Read all five and it gets stranger.

    The part I did not expect

    Cost of revenues rose about 5% while revenue rose 8%. Work that through and gross margin came in near 57.3% this quarter against roughly 56.1% a year ago, so the gross line improved by something on the order of a point. Both inputs are rounded in the release, so the size of the improvement is approximate. The direction holds across the whole rounding band.

    That matters because it relocates the problem.

    For three years the story on this company has been margin compression, and it has been true. Gross margin ran near 63% in fiscal 2023 and near 56% in fiscal 2025, and operating margin fell from the high twenties into the low twenties over the same stretch. This quarter that slide stopped at the gross line, and the entire earnings decline showed up one level down in operating expenses that management chose to incur.

    Non-GAAP research and development rose 40%. Non-GAAP general and administrative expense more than doubled off a small base. Sales and marketing grew 10% and held flat at 26% of revenue.

    The sequential picture is stronger still. Operating margin recovered to 24.7% from 18.4% in the March quarter, and the trailing figure now sits above its own five-year average of 20.7%.

    So the compression is discretionary this quarter. Compression that comes from losing pricing power to a competitor would be a far worse problem, and separating the two is most of what Q2 gave us.

    The line nobody put in the headline

    Now the part that made me lower a number.

    Keep Reading

    Create a free account to access more content.

    Sign in to leave a comment and join the discussion.

    Sign Up Free