The math of the next eighteen months is uncomfortable in a specific way. Brent has been printing triple-digit handles on Hormuz tanker disruption headlines. The S&P 500 has already taken a 2.6% intra-year drawdown, modest by the standards of midterm cycles where the median peak-to-trough decline since 1950 sits near 15%. The Fed is sitting somewhere trying to decide whether oil-driven inflation is transitory or structural this time.
The natural impulse for investors right now is to pick a scenario and lean into it. Buy oil if the inflationary geopolitical shock keeps escalating, buy long bonds if the Fed pivots dovish, hide in staples if the equity market just rolls over.
Make sure to try out our new AI-console! Create sub-agents, memories, and many other features!
Each of those bets requires being right about a macro regime that nobody, including the Fed, currently has high conviction on.
What follows is a different construction. Eight names, weighted to specific jobs, designed to do acceptable work regardless of which storm actually shows up. The construction philosophy: every position has one defined role, no two positions overlap on revenue drivers, and every named risk in the mandate is covered by at least one name.
Sign in to leave a comment and join the discussion.
Sign Up Free