AACN
    IIBM
    CCTSH
    IINFY
    value investing

    Accenture: My March Fair Value Was Too High. The Stock Is Still Too Cheap

    Accenture: My March Fair Value Was Too High. The Stock Is Still Too Cheap
    • I overstated March fair value, cutting blended Vulcan BFV to $227.62 (-22%), stock trading at $176.89, down ~17% since March and bottoming at $118.15 in June
    • Fiscal Q2 showed strength - record bookings $22.11B (+6%), book-to-bill 1.2, free cash flow $3.7B, adjusted operating margin +30bps, management raised FY FCF guide by $1.0B
    • Fiscal Q3 mixed - bookings -3% LC to $19.32B, consulting +1% LC to $9.3B, revenue +3% LC to $18.7B, operating margin 17.0% (+20bps), EPS $3.80 (+9%), FCF $3.6B, FY FCF guide $10.8-11.5B
    • AI is both the biggest opportunity and structural risk - automation can compress hours-based economics, but 104 client engagements >$100M (+13%) and ~$38B RPO argue durable integration demand
    • Primary downside risk is M&A cadence - Vulcan normalizes $2.53B annual acquisition burden, implying normalized FCFF ~$9.13B; management's FY26 acquisition plan near ~$9B could materially lower fair value further
    Glenn Ford
    Aug 18, 20261:28 PM70

    Back in March I published a piece called The Dividend Compounder Trading at a Value Price. It argued that Accenture (ACN) was a $292 business trading near $213, and that the market's AI disruption worry had the story pointed in the wrong direction.

    The stock is now ~$172 as of pre-market on August 18th, 2026.

    So before anything else, let's start with the scoreboard, because it is not flattering. Shares are down roughly 17% since that article while the broad market rose, and they traded all the way to $118.15 in June.

    How wrong was I? I named $204 as the ultra-value zone where a full position gets completed, and I put the downside case at a 5% to 8% loss. Both got run over inside three months.

    I'm not going to dress that up as a call we nailed. What I underestimated is how far the market will reprice a genuinely good business once it decides the business model itself is the question.

    Here's what I did get right, and it's the only reason this update is worth writing. Before the drawdown started, I wrote down the exact condition that would prove the thesis broken: two consecutive quarters of declining bookings, combined with full-year revenue guidance falling below 2%.

    That condition has not been met.

    So why cut fair value by 22% and still call it a Strong Buy? Let's get right to it. My updated Vulcan fair value is $227.62, roughly 22% below the old number. Even after that cut, the stock still sits inside the Strong Buy zone with 22.3% margin of safety, and I think the price is asking the business to do something it is not currently doing.

    Keep Reading

    Create a free account to access more content.

    Sign in to leave a comment and join the discussion.

    Sign Up Free