D

    DBMF (DBMF)

    Alternative • Managed Futures

    $31.41
    +0.00 (+0.00%)

    Market Cap: $2.00B

    Last updated: Sep 01, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET

    Dividends

    Dividend Metrics

    Yield1.31%
    Annual/Share$0.41
    Frequency4
    Pay MonthsMar, Jun, Sep, Dec

    Growth

    3Y CAGR-39.76%
    5Y CAGR+95.06%
    View DBMF's full dividend history

    DBMF (DBMF)

    Managed Futures • USA

    Net Assets (AUM)$2.00B
    Expense Ratio0.8500%
    Dividend YieldN/A
    Portfolio Turnover0.00%
    Inception DateMay 7, 2019

    Sector Allocations

    No sector allocation data available

    Technical Indicators

    RSI: Neutral
    RSI (14)56.76
    VWAP
    $31.440

    Simple Moving Averages

    SMA 10
    $31.21
    SMA 20
    $31.18
    SMA 50
    $30.96
    SMA 200
    $29.89

    Exponential Moving Averages

    EMA 10
    $31.25
    EMA 20
    $31.19
    EMA 50
    $31.03
    EMA 200
    $29.72

    Holdings

    No holdings data available

    Related GNG Research

    Is CTA Broken? Three Wars, Nine Funds, and Exactly What To Do About It 😉

    In December I told you CTA wasn't broken, just cyclical. In March it went UP while the market fell 10%. Then May and June happened and it fell 19% while the S&P set twenty-five all-time highs 😳 Simplify's own risk profile: Brent crude is 56.95% of CTA's entire risk. Three energy contracts are 84.68%. No stocks, no bonds, no currencies. Eight commodity contracts = 100% of the fund 🤯 CTA isn't broken. It's working perfectly on a job you no longer need done. It stopped being a hedge and became a leveraged bet on whether a war continues. Those aren't the same thing 🥺 The fix isn't selling CTA, it's resizing it for a better hedging bucket: CTA 30% · DBMF 25% · IALT 25% · KMLM 10% · IAUM 10%. Five sleeves that break on different days, for a blended 0.78% expense ratio 🖖 40% better annual returns than CTA (and 10% better than the S&P) with 50% less volatility (of both CTA and the S&P). Even lower volatility than a 60/40 portfolio!🤯 Peak declines 50% lower than CTA's And with far better consistency of returns (no down year in the last 5) and 5/5 of the last corrections positive returns and -56% downside capture of the S&P. These 5 ETFs work so perfectly because they all diversify each other and create stronger negative correlation to stocks than CTA alone. There is no free lunch in investing Except diversification and this is the best hedging bucket I've seen yet.

    Unknown Author
    8/14/26
    719
    hedging
    managed futures
    Geopolitical Risk
    Also mentions:
    DBMF
    KMLM
    IALT
    IAUM

    News

    Get full access to GNG Research

    Create a free account to access portfolio tracking, advanced tools, and more.