Union Pacific Corporation (UNP)
Official siteINDUSTRIALS • RAILROADS • NYSE
Market Cap: $182.62B
Last updated: Sep 01, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET
Earnings
Performance (10Y)
Upcoming Estimates
Dividends
Dividend Metrics
Growth
Key Metrics
Technical Indicators Dashboard
Moving Averages
MACD
ADX
Aroon & PSAR
Bollinger Bands
RSI (14-Day)
Momentum Oscillators
Volatility Measures
Volume Flow
Volume Metrics
Pivot Points
Advanced Oscillators
Financial Data
Related GNG Research
How To Buy Stocks Nobody Wants - Without Blowing Up Your Portfolio
Durable edge is willingness to hold unloved, high-quality businesses - excess return comes from unique info, reframed misreads, or holding what others cannot Behavioral constraints matter - losses feel ~2x gains (Kahneman/Tversky) and myopic loss aversion makes frequent checking costly, accumulate over quarters not days Diagnose weakness before acting - distinguish cyclical, secular decline, or idiosyncratic problems, then apply a tailored response rather than relying on courage Position sizing and execution are risk controls - scale in over quarters, size to survive being early, and set predefined re-eval triggers to limit ruin risk Practical proof points - author down ~30% on QXO, while UNP was bought through a 3+ year sideways cycle and later rewarded, illustrating timing risk and payoff
The Investing Lesson That Changed Everything For Me
Kirby coffee-can case - $5,000 initial buys (≈$16k today) left untouched produced one Haloid stake worth >$800,000 in Xerox, beating the professional portfolio and highlighting value of not trading winners away Bessembinder (1926-2016) on ~26,000 U.S. stocks - majority underperformed 1-month T-bills, 4% of firms generated all net wealth above T-bills, and ~90 firms (0.3%) created over half of market wealth Phelps and Mayer on 100-baggers - hundreds of 100x winners existed, the average 100-bagger took ~26 years, so premature selling of winners forfeits the disproportionate long-term compounding Behavioral evidence - Barber and Odean show most-active retail traders underperformed by >6% annually and sold stocks later seen outperforming replacements, supporting pre-commitment tools like a never-sell list Practical application - author holds winners despite valuation (GE +50% last year, forward EPS multiple >40x); recommended actions: set never-sell core positions, size for volatility, add on weakness, accept some losers
Starting Over: The 15-Stock Dividend Portfolio My Own Rules Would Build
TOLL+M disciplined 15-stock build: 15 holdings, average forward yield >=3%, one name per sleeve, no manager overrides Toll-road core via EPD and WMB - EPD yields ~6%, 27-year increase streak, DCF coverage >1.6x; WMB grows faster but has a 2016 cut scar Real-asset income engines: UNP (rail oligopoly), CME (exchanges), LMT (defense, payout mid-60s, long backlog), VICI and Realty Income - O has 30+ years of raises Framework fills gaps: NextEra - dividend +10% last year, payout ~40%; PepsiCo - yield >4% and 50+ years of raises; TXN and AbbVie meet TOLL+M thresholds Investor playbook: one-per-sector diversification, target >=3% avg forward yield, score holdings with TOLL+M, avoid concentration, add sleeves for higher income or themes
The Diversification Test Every Investor Should Run (Built Into GNG)
Counting holdings is misleading - a 12-stock, 10-industry model that appeared diversified lost most diversification once positions were grouped by underlying return drivers Academic rules conflict on count - Evans & Archer (1968) says 10-15 stocks, Statman (1987) 30-40, Statman (2004) >300, all assume near-zero pairwise correlation (~0.08) Portfolio risk decomposes into idiosyncratic risk/N plus average covariance - the covariance is the non-diversifiable floor that additional names cannot breach Run the 20-minute test - build a pairwise correlation matrix or regress returns by economic drivers, compute average covariance and effective number of independent bets GNG embeds this test - prioritize holdings with distinct economic engines, size concentration to your demonstrated edge, and use ETF sleeves if you lack research bandwidth (peer uses 50% ETF)
The AI Trade Isn’t Breaking - It's Rewiring The Entire Market
The market is shifting to machine-speed, agentic dynamics, so traditional 20th-century behavioral frameworks are insufficient for generating alpha in this structural AI-led regime QQQ rallied ~30% in under two months, top 10 stocks now represent roughly 40% of the S&P 500, Q1 profits jumped 27% vs ~12% consensus, trailing 12-month margins hit 13.9% The Passive Arbitrage Trap - market-cap weighted passive inflows mechanically allocate growing index weight into AI mega-caps, creating a self-reinforcing feedback loop that forces buying Durable demand and cash flow support - hyperscalers and leading semiconductor firms are printing free cash flow amid a quoted $90 trillion global AI capex upgrade cycle, implying sustained spending Actionable investor steps - stress-test portfolios for index concentration, model passive-flow dependence, maintain selective exposure to AI leaders, and employ hedges or non-cap-weighted strategies to limit tail risk
News
Frequently Asked Questions About UNP
- What is UNP's current dividend yield?
- Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) has a current dividend yield of 1.85%.
- Does UNP pay dividends?
- Yes, Union Pacific Corporation pays dividends with a current yield of 1.85%.
- What is UNP's P/E ratio?
- Union Pacific Corporation has a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 24.49.
- What is UNP's market cap?
- Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) has a market capitalization of $182.62B with a current stock price of $300.77.
Get full access to GNG Research
Create a free account to access portfolio tracking, advanced tools, and more.